See Bs.
ve 2 Te — me Bi f
Beni o DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
mi SRE, SPN BUARKL FOR GURRECTHUN OF NAVAL RELIED
Bi ie La] 704 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
- ‘te ..
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BIC
Docket No. NR7631-13
19 Nov 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
18 November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memo 1600 RCT dated
24 October 2014, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application and
your request for a personal appearance pefore the Board have been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the ciroumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it +s important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR763i-12
Bee Reem me se mF eg
Comsequeiliy 7 Wiitia ape y anG soe & SS J
record, the burden is on the app cNAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6869 14
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1600 RcT of 5 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014 and again on 5 June 2014 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6870 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1660 RCT of 6 May 2014, a COpy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. ra correction of an official Consequently, when applying fo naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1336 RCT dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12374 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on a 11 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate’ the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6794-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2014. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, | regulations and policies. entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material | error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3281 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. presumption of Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8208 14
You again requested removal of the fitness report for 3 June to 2 September 2011. In your previous case, docket number 1076-12, this ~equest was denied on 26 April 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's file on your previous case, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies..
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6132 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO6132-14 ction of an official naval to demonstrate the existence of plying E6r a Serre record, the burden is on the applicant Consequently, when ap probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8355 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO08355-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6243 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo MPO dated a a copy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.